Speed without quality is reckless. Quality without speed is irrelevant. The challenge is finding the right balance for each context.

I assess the situation: Is this a core feature or an experiment? How much impact does it have? What’s the cost of delay?

For high-stakes features, I invest in quality processes. For low-risk experiments, I prioritize speed and learning.

The right balance changes over time. Early stage products need speed to find product-market fit. Mature products need quality to maintain trust.

There’s no universal formula—only thoughtful trade-offs based on context, impact, and risk. Balance isn’t static—it’s a constant calibration.